杨俊娥, 陆苏, 刘红. 不同新辅助化疗方案治疗乳腺癌近期疗效观察[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2011, 38(7): 405-408 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2011.07.011
引用本文: 杨俊娥, 陆苏, 刘红. 不同新辅助化疗方案治疗乳腺癌近期疗效观察[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2011, 38(7): 405-408 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2011.07.011

不同新辅助化疗方案治疗乳腺癌近期疗效观察

  • 摘要: 目的:本研究对比观察多西他赛联合表柔比星加/不加环磷酰胺 (TE/TEC) 两种新辅助化疗方案治疗乳腺癌的近期疗效和不良反应。方法: 回顾性分析2007年6月~2009年3月间本院收治的174例Ⅱ、 Ⅲ期的乳腺癌患者临床病理资料。依据患者术前接受新辅助化疗的方案将其分为TE组及TEC组, 两组患者均在术前接受2~4个周期化疗, 并在术后完成剩余化疗周期。TE方案: 多西他赛 (DOC) 75 mg/m2, 第1天静脉滴注, 表柔比星 (EPI) 60 mg/m2, 第1天静脉滴注; TEC方案: 多西他赛 (DOC) 75 mg/m2, 第1天静脉滴注, 表柔比星 (EPI) 60 mg/m2, 第1天静脉滴注, 环磷酰胺 (CTX) 600 mg/m2, 第1天静脉滴注。以上方案均21天一个周期。结果: 全组总有效率80.5 %, 其中TE组有效率77.4 %, 低于TEC组 (84.0 %), 但差异无统计学意义 (P=0.278)。TE组pCR为6.5 %, 低于TEC组7.4 %, 差异无统计学意义 (P=0.804)。TE组和TEC组主要不良反应均为中性粒细胞减少、 脱发、 恶心呕吐、贫血、 肝功能异常、 心脏毒性。TEC组中性粒细胞减少发生率明显高于TE组, 两组间差异有统计学意义 (P=0.026)。结论: 在Ⅱ、Ⅲ期乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗中, TE与TEC的3周方案近期疗效相近。但两组在中性粒细胞减少的发生率方面有显著性差异,TEC方案的发生率明显高于TE方案。

     

    Abstract: Efficacy of Different Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens for Breast CancerJune YANG, Su LU, Hong LIUCorrespondence to: Hong LIU, E-mail: Kathy_liu99@yahoo.comThe Second Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, ChinaAbstract Objective: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and toxicity of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy of Docetaxel and Epi-rubicin combined with or without Cyclophosphamide in breast cancer patients. Methods: Data of 174 women with stageⅡ/Ⅲ breastcancer treated in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital between June 2007 and March 2009 were retrospectively ana-lyzed. These patients were divided into two groups based on the regimen of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy: 93 received TE regimen (Docetaxel 75 mg/m2and Epirubicin 60 mg/m2) and 81 received TEC ( Docetaxel 75 mg/m2, Epirubicin 60 mg/m2and Cyclophospha-mide 600 mg/m2). IV drip infusion was administered in both groups for 2-4 cycles before surgery, with 3 weeks for each cycle. And theremaining course of treatment was completed after surgery. Results: The overall response rate ( ORR ) was 80.5%. The ORR in the TEgroup was 77.4%, lower than in the TEC group ( 84.0% ), with no significant difference ( P = 0.278 ). The pCR was 6.5% in the TEgroup, lower than in the TEC group ( 7.4% ), with no significant difference ( P = 0.804 ). The main toxic reactions in the two groupswere neutropenia, alopecia, nausea and vomiting, anaemia, liver dysfunction and cardiac toxicity. The incidence of neutropenia was ob-viously higher in the TE group than in the TEC group, with a significant difference ( P = 0.026 ). Conclusion: In females with stageⅡ/Ⅲ breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the short-term efficacy of the 3-week TE and TEC regimens is similar, butTEC regimen can cause higher incidence of neutropenia.Keywords Breast cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Docetaxel; Epirubicin

     

/

返回文章
返回